Goji Labs vs Spaceberry Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Goji Labs (3.9/5) edges ahead of Spaceberry Studio (3.7/5) overall. Goji Labs is the better choice for startups, entrepreneurs, and nonprofits wanting strategy-led product design without enterprise-agency pricing.. Spaceberry Studio is the stronger option for budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Goji Labs vs Spaceberry Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Goji Labs | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2016 |
| HQ | West Hollywood / Los Angeles, CA, USA | Ukraine (also London, UK) |
| Team size | 11–50 | 12–50 |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 3.7 / 5 |
| Best for | Startups, entrepreneurs, and nonprofits wanting strategy-led product design without enterprise-agency pricing. | Budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, T&M | Monthly subscription (dedicated designer) |
| Min. engagement | $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, React, Swift | Figma, Framer, Webflow |
| Industries served | EdTech, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
Goji Labs vs Spaceberry Studio: overview
Goji Labs
David Barlev and Adam Sumner founded Goji Labs in 2014 (one source cites 2015); it's based in West Hollywood/Los Angeles with 11–50 employees (roughly 50 per most sources). A 2025 Inc. 5000 honoree with 84 Clutch reviews, the firm describes itself as strategy-led with deep edtech, fintech, and healthtech experience, and explicitly extends its client base to entrepreneurs and nonprofits alongside funded companies.
Spaceberry Studio
Spaceberry Studio launched in 2016 as 'MainCode Agency' before rebranding to Spaceberry in 2020; 2016 is used as the founding year since it's the same continuous team and entity. Based in Ukraine with an additional London, UK location, the firm reports 12–50 employees depending on source. It offers subscription-style UI/UX design for SaaS, AI, and mobile apps — one of two subscription comparators in this list alongside Eleken.
Services and capabilities: Goji Labs vs Spaceberry Studio
| Capability | Goji Labs | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✗ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Goji Labs vs Spaceberry Studio
| Framework / platform | Goji Labs | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | ✓ |
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| Framer | N/A | ✓ |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Goji Labs vs Spaceberry Studio
| Criterion | Goji Labs | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time & materials | Subscription |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Goji Labs vs Spaceberry Studio
| Dimension | Goji Labs | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | EdTech, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
| Best use cases | Nonprofit or mission-driven product design, EdTech or healthtech MVP for an early-stage startup | Ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription, AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Subscription |
Goji Labs vs Spaceberry Studio: pros and cons
| Goji Labs | |
|---|---|
| + | Independently verified 2025 Inc. 5000 growth recognition |
| + | 84 Clutch reviews provide a substantial independent feedback sample |
| + | Explicitly serves nonprofits and individual entrepreneurs, not only funded startups |
| + | Strategy-led approach pairs product discovery with delivery inside one team |
| - | The 11–50 employee band is smaller than most other boutiques here, limiting capacity for very large programs |
| - | Founding year is disputed between sources (2014 vs. 2015) |
| - | Focus on edtech/fintech/healthtech means less depth for consumer or enterprise-only projects |
| Spaceberry Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | Subscription pricing (from ~$4.5K/month, per company website; independently unverifiable) is one of the lowest barriers to entry here |
| + | Focused specifically on SaaS, AI, and mobile apps rather than spreading thin across many verticals |
| + | London, UK location adds geographic diversification alongside its Ukraine base |
| + | Continuous operation since 2016, spanning its 2020 rebrand from MainCode Agency |
| - | Smallest reported team-size band (12–50) among the boutiques in this list, limiting capacity for large programs |
| - | Rebranded from MainCode Agency in 2020, so some pre-2020 case studies may appear under the earlier name |
| - | Subscription-only model may not suit clients preferring a single fixed-price contract with a defined end date |
Who should choose Goji Labs?
Goji Labs is the right choice for startups, entrepreneurs, and nonprofits wanting strategy-led product design without enterprise-agency pricing..
A 2025 Inc. 5000 honoree that explicitly extends beyond funded startups to nonprofits and individual entrepreneurs. Minimum engagement starts at $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in EdTech, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare.
Who should choose Spaceberry Studio?
Spaceberry Studio is the right choice for budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract..
One of the most accessible entry points in this list via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract. Minimum engagement starts at $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products.
Decision matrix: Goji Labs vs Spaceberry Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Goji Labs |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Goji Labs |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Goji Labs |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Goji Labs vs Spaceberry Studio
| Use case | Goji Labs fit | Spaceberry Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nonprofit or mission-driven product design | Strong | Limited | Goji Labs |
| EdTech or healthtech MVP for an early-stage startup | Strong | Limited | Goji Labs |
| Ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription | Limited | Strong | Spaceberry Studio |
| AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team | Limited | Strong | Spaceberry Studio |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Goji Labs vs Spaceberry Studio
Goji Labs (3.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A 2025 Inc. 5000 honoree that explicitly extends beyond funded startups to nonprofits and individual entrepreneurs. It is best for startups, entrepreneurs, and nonprofits wanting strategy-led product design without enterprise-agency pricing..
Spaceberry Studio (3.7/5) is the better choice when budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract.. If your situation matches those criteria, Spaceberry Studio is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Goji Labs vs Spaceberry Studio FAQ
Is Goji Labs better than Spaceberry Studio?
Goji Labs (3.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Goji Labs is better for startups, entrepreneurs, and nonprofits wanting strategy-led product design without enterprise-agency pricing.. Spaceberry Studio is better for budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract..
How do Goji Labs and Spaceberry Studio differ in pricing?
Goji Labs uses fixed project, t&m pricing with a minimum engagement of $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Spaceberry Studio uses monthly subscription (dedicated designer) pricing with a minimum engagement of $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Goji Labs or Spaceberry Studio?
Spaceberry Studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each firm before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Goji Labs and Spaceberry Studio?
Goji Labs's primary differentiator is: a 2025 inc. 5000 honoree that explicitly extends beyond funded startups to nonprofits and individual entrepreneurs. Spaceberry Studio's primary differentiator is: one of the most accessible entry points in this list via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract. They also differ in team size (11–50 vs 12–50), minimum engagement ($15K (per company website; independently unverifiable) vs $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (EdTech, Financial services / fintech vs SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products).
Verify all details directly with each firm before making a decision.