Gapsy Studio vs Onething Design: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) edges ahead of Onething Design (3.8/5) overall. Gapsy Studio is the better choice for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history.. Onething Design is the stronger option for companies needing one firm that covers BFSI, consumer, enterprise, healthcare, and automotive without switching vendors per vertical.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Gapsy Studio vs Onething Design: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Gapsy Studio | Onething Design |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2015 |
| HQ | Dnipro, Ukraine | Gurugram, India (also Bangalore and San Francisco) |
| Team size | Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects) | 52–73 |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Best for | Fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history. | Companies needing one firm that covers BFSI, consumer, enterprise, healthcare, and automotive without switching vendors per vertical. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Webflow, After Effects | Figma, Sketch, Adobe Creative Suite |
| Industries served | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail | Financial services / fintech, Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare, Automotive & mobility |
Gapsy Studio vs Onething Design: overview
Gapsy Studio
Gapsy Studio describes itself as operating 'since 2014' (also citing '9+ years of experience'; treated here as self-reported), based in Dnipro, Ukraine. Rather than publish a headcount, it positions itself as a 'collective of creative professionals' behind 500+ completed projects. A 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews and 13+ international awards (Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, DesignRush) back its work across UI/UX, branding, motion, and web/app development for fintech, SaaS, health, education, and retail clients.
Onething Design
Onething Design took its current name in 2015, renamed from a 2014 predecessor ('Ketchup Designs Studio'), so the founding year is treated as approximate. Headquartered in Gurugram, India with additional locations in Bangalore and San Francisco, the firm reports 52–73 employees depending on source. What sets it apart is industry breadth: BFSI, consumer products, enterprise, healthcare, and automotive, all served from one team rather than a single-vertical specialty.
Services and capabilities: Gapsy Studio vs Onething Design
| Capability | Gapsy Studio | Onething Design |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✗ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Gapsy Studio vs Onething Design
| Framework / platform | Gapsy Studio | Onething Design |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | ✓ | N/A |
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | ✓ |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Gapsy Studio vs Onething Design
| Criterion | Gapsy Studio | Onething Design |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Gapsy Studio vs Onething Design
| Dimension | Gapsy Studio | Onething Design |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare | Financial services / fintech, Consumer products, Enterprise transformation |
| Best use cases | Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work, Healthcare or EdTech product redesign | BFSI product design for a bank or insurer, Automotive digital interface design |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Gapsy Studio vs Onething Design: pros and cons
| Gapsy Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 public reviews — one of the highest verified scores in this list |
| + | 13+ international design awards across Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, and DesignRush |
| + | 500+ completed projects demonstrates a substantial delivery track record |
| + | Covers five distinct industries (fintech, SaaS, health, education, retail) from one team |
| - | Doesn't publish a specific headcount, describing itself as a 'collective' — harder to gauge delivery capacity |
| - | Founding year is self-reported ('since 2014') rather than independently confirmed |
| - | Its broad five-industry positioning trades off some depth against single-vertical specialists like UXDA |
| Onething Design | |
|---|---|
| + | Covers five distinct industries from a single team, useful for clients working across multiple verticals |
| + | US (San Francisco) and India (Gurugram, Bangalore) footprint supports round-the-clock delivery |
| + | $10K minimum engagement (per company website; independently unverifiable) is accessible relative to most peers in this list |
| + | A decade of operation under its current name, with roots stretching back further |
| - | Founding year is approximate — the firm was renamed from an earlier predecessor in 2015 |
| - | Its broad five-industry positioning gives up some vertical-specific depth compared with specialists like UXDA |
| - | Reported employee count varies by source (52–73), making capacity planning less precise |
Who should choose Gapsy Studio?
Gapsy Studio is the right choice for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history..
A 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards from Behance, Awwwards, and FWA. Minimum engagement starts at $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail.
Who should choose Onething Design?
Onething Design is the right choice for companies needing one firm that covers BFSI, consumer, enterprise, healthcare, and automotive without switching vendors per vertical..
Unusually broad five-industry coverage from one team, with delivery presence spanning the US and India. Minimum engagement starts at $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech, Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare, Automotive & mobility.
Decision matrix: Gapsy Studio vs Onething Design
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Gapsy Studio |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Gapsy Studio |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Gapsy Studio |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Gapsy Studio |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Gapsy Studio vs Onething Design
| Use case | Gapsy Studio fit | Onething Design fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work | Strong | Limited | Gapsy Studio |
| Healthcare or EdTech product redesign | Strong | Limited | Gapsy Studio |
| BFSI product design for a bank or insurer | Limited | Strong | Onething Design |
| Automotive digital interface design | Limited | Strong | Onething Design |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Gapsy Studio vs Onething Design
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards from Behance, Awwwards, and FWA. It is best for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history..
Onething Design (3.8/5) is the better choice when companies needing one firm that covers BFSI, consumer, enterprise, healthcare, and automotive without switching vendors per vertical.. If your situation matches those criteria, Onething Design is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Gapsy Studio vs Onething Design FAQ
Is Gapsy Studio better than Onething Design?
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Gapsy Studio is better for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history.. Onething Design is better for companies needing one firm that covers BFSI, consumer, enterprise, healthcare, and automotive without switching vendors per vertical..
How do Gapsy Studio and Onething Design differ in pricing?
Gapsy Studio uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Onething Design uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Gapsy Studio or Onething Design?
Onething Design is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each firm before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Gapsy Studio and Onething Design?
Gapsy Studio's primary differentiator is: a 5.0/5.0 clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards from behance, awwwards, and fwa. Onething Design's primary differentiator is: unusually broad five-industry coverage from one team, with delivery presence spanning the us and india. They also differ in team size (Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects) vs 52–73), minimum engagement ($10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) vs $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software vs Financial services / fintech, Consumer products).
Verify all details directly with each firm before making a decision.